There is an email being
circulated quoting the Prime Minister of Australia, Julia Gillard. I have
friends from all over the political map so if you didn’t get this one, you
won’t get it from me. But there is a story here for organizations and families.
It’s called the Problem-Saturated Story.
Part of her supposed
speech as reported on email and Snopes: “This is our country, our land, and our lifestyle,
and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are
done complaining, whining, and griping about our flag, our pledge, our Christian
beliefs, or our way of life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other
great Australian freedom, the right to leave.”
I have read editorials that had too much fun by half declaiming the many faults of our country. We were leaving the Metropolitan Art Museum in New York City and met a protester on the sidewalk. His placard encouraged us to do unmentionable things to then-President George Bush. We cheerfully disagreed but encouraged him to express his opinions. A couple were strolling past and heard our exchange. When I exclaimed, “Isn’t this a wonderful country where we can disagree,” the woman hissed and although walking away from us, continued to turn back to hiss more. (Until then I had never heard a human hiss-s-s.) What upset her I’m not sure and I wasn’t interested in asking. I suspect she was one with the editors who enjoy telling horror stories about “the Tea Party.” And there are those who enjoy telling similar tales about “the Left.” If I join any of them, I will be participating in a Problem-Saturated Story.
I have read editorials that had too much fun by half declaiming the many faults of our country. We were leaving the Metropolitan Art Museum in New York City and met a protester on the sidewalk. His placard encouraged us to do unmentionable things to then-President George Bush. We cheerfully disagreed but encouraged him to express his opinions. A couple were strolling past and heard our exchange. When I exclaimed, “Isn’t this a wonderful country where we can disagree,” the woman hissed and although walking away from us, continued to turn back to hiss more. (Until then I had never heard a human hiss-s-s.) What upset her I’m not sure and I wasn’t interested in asking. I suspect she was one with the editors who enjoy telling horror stories about “the Tea Party.” And there are those who enjoy telling similar tales about “the Left.” If I join any of them, I will be participating in a Problem-Saturated Story.
We occasionally get a
health care worker who takes our report of a resident and tries to turn it into
a story about what a problem the resident is. Such commiseration is
unprofessional and unappreciated. We cut them off. Dementia is what it is.
When you overhear
someone in your congregation, book club, or family launch into a diatribe about
how awful something is or how difficult, or how they just can’t understand, you
are being invited to a Problem-Saturated whine fest. You might for a brief
moment join them by thinking, “If you think your husband is bad let me tell
you about mine.” All of us have multiple substitutions for husbands. Mothers-in-law have been fair game since Cain and Abel (The
Bible. Genesis 4).
Organizations and
families may blunder into an atmosphere
of problem-saturation. Emotional discharges will turn the air blue once
permission is given. Transforming the tune of P-S tales becomes almost
impossible short of a traumatic, public censure of the story tellers. The
stories are addictive and close the book on the subject having any possible redemptive
value.
I was visiting a couple
and the wife informed me that she could barely sit in her pew and listen to that man. Just watching him walk you could see that he was blahblahblah. For her, attending church had become an
exciting opportunity to invent more nasty tales.
I had several choices:
silence which could be seen as consent, join the party and tell a
problem-saturated story of my own, or argue with her. I chose to follow Matthew
18 which instructs us to go to the sister who has ticked us off and “show her
fault.” If you get no satisfaction, find a third party who can provide
accountability and attempt reconciliation. I asked the wife if she had spoken
to the minister about her feelings. I
was soon ushered out of their home and the wife never spoke to me again.
The difficulty with Problem-Saturated
Stories is that the teller rarely desires truth or accountability. He wants to
diminish and whine. P-S stories put forward as fact what is simply a narrative
of oft-repeated testimony by a biased witness. Someone needs to step outside the circle, snap
their fingers, and disrupt the trance of the P-S storyteller. Someone needs to ask accountability questions
and offer to accompany the tale bearer to a meeting with her subject.
Especially if the
scandal has substance. So what? Do we keep piling on stones, or stand next to
the scoundrel offering a hand and the energy to pull him out of the pit? If he
hisses at us he has written the final chapter of the story, and our mouths are
sealed. We are free to walk to the coffee shop and share celebrative stories of
humor and warmth and love with our friends.
P.S. If you are a leader and want to learn more, read Margaret Wheatley’s book Turning to One Another. “There is no power greater than a community
discovering what it cares about. Ask, ‘What’s possible?’ not ‘What’s wrong?’
Keep asking. . . . Be brave enough to start a conversation that matters.”
No comments:
Post a Comment